Skip to main content

Raila’s CORD WINS round II of the court battle against Uhuru’s DRACONIAN SECURITY LAWS

1106.jpg

By Phil Wesonga AG petition on suspension of security act clauses dismissed. The Court of Appeal has dismissed Attorney General Githu Muigai petition challenging Justice Odunga’s suspension of eight clauses in the new security law. In his ruling on January 2, 2015, Justice George Odunga gave conservatory orders with respect to eight clauses pending hearing and determination of the petitions. He also determined that the petitions raised substantial questions of law under clause 3 (b) and (d) of Article 165 (4) of the Constitution and recommended the empanelling of a bench by the CJ, to hear and determine the petitions. The case had been filed by CORD and the National Commission on Human Rights. Acting on behalf of the Jubilee administration, the AG had filed a Memorandum of Appeal and an urgent application to have the order suspended, arguing that under Article 23 of the Constitution, the court could not suspend an enacted law but can only declare it invalid as a final determination in proceedings. So far, Chief Justice Willy Mutunga has constituted a five-judge bench to hear and determine the Coalition for Reforms and Democracy (CORD) and the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR) petition challenging the legality of the Security Laws (Amendment) Act 2014. The bench comprising of Justices Isaac Lenaola (presiding), Mumbi Ngugi, Louis Onguto, Hilary Chemitei, and Hedwig Ong’udi will hear the consolidated petitions in Nairobi on three consecutive days agreed upon by the parties and deliver judgement on or before February 13, 2015.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Take care of yourself__"The first wealth is health".

By Strive Masiyiwa  A few weeks ago I went to the doctor. I will tell you what he said about my health at the end, but first read this: Twenty years ago, I arranged to meet a well-known British international businessman who invested a lot in Africa at the time. We agreed to meet for dinner at a leading hotel in London.  After a good meeting, we started to walk out of the restaurant when he suddenly collapsed in the lobby. There was total pandemonium as they rushed to get medical assistance. Being London, an ambulance arrived in minutes. I jumped in the back with him as paramedics wrestled to keep him alive. He had had a heart attack and had to have triple bypass heart surgery. Sadly he died a few weeks later. He hadn't been sick and his sudden death surprised everyone. And yet as I reflected on it, and later discussed it with a doctor friend who knew him, I realized he was very laid back about his health despite having a hectic business life. Even during our dinner...

Freedom: The One Thing Gaddafi Could Not Give — And the One Thing No Government Can Take Away

For years, the collapse of Libya under Muammar Gaddafi puzzled many observers across Africa and the world. How could a country with high living standards, generous state programs, and a strong economy turn so swiftly against a leader who appeared to have delivered materially for his people? This question is not just about Libya. It speaks to a deeper truth about governance, legitimacy, and the limits of developmental authoritarianism. It speaks to Africa’s political future. And it speaks directly to the crossroads at which Kenya now finds itself. --- The Libyan Paradox: Prosperity Without Liberty Before the 2011 uprising, Libya’s economic and social indicators were strikingly strong for the region. Gaddafi’s Libya boasted: Free education Free healthcare Subsidized housing Cheap fuel High employment An extensive welfare system These were not myths. The United Nations Human Development Index (HDI) of 2010 ranked Libya 53rd in the world and first in Africa. Even today, that ranking stands...