Skip to main content

Why Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Should Have Become Kenya’s Second President:-Hon Koigi Wamwere

40460-16-200x133.jpg BY Hon Koigi Wamwere For a long time I have agonized over who should have been second president of Kenya. Though Kenyatta was hardly perfect and was a dictator, before he assumed power, he was such an icon of freedom and symbol of African struggle for independence along with other African freedom fighters like Kwame Nkrumah and Julius Nyerere that the position of first president in their country was theirs automatically. In Kenya, Oginga Odinga already led the African campaign for the release of Jomo Kenyatta from prison and his assumption of Kenya’s first president. Of all Kenyan politicians, Odinga was the most committed to the notion that Kenyatta should be the first president of Kenya and there is no evidence that he ever contemplated challenging him for presidency. When it comes to the second president of Kenya however, I believe Oginga Odinga should have succeeded Kenyatta, not Daniel Arap Moi. If Oginga Odinga never become the second president of Kenya, it is not because he did not qualify for it but because Kenyatta did not reciprocate the loyalty that Odinga had demonstrated for him. Had Kenyatta supported Odinga the way Odinga had supported him, Odinga would easily have become the second president of Kenya. Oginga Odinga should have become second president of Kenya because he was more qualified for it than Moi. Despite the hell I suffered at the hands of President Moi, I have no personal grudge against him. It is therefore for no personal grudge that I say that between Odinga and Moi, Odinga qualified for the second presidency of Kenya many times more than Moi. In fact, on account of his unparalleled courage and admission of Kenyan leaders’ failure to take Kenya to the Promised Land, at the time of Kenyatta’s death, no other Kenyan leader qualified more for second presidency of Kenya than Jaramogi Oginga Odinga. Finally, to use the words of Johnny Carson that choices have consequences, our choices of Kenyatta as our first president, Moi as our second president, Kibaki as our third president and Uhuru as our fourth president all have consequences that explain what Kenya is today – a land of unending calamities of terrorism, hunger, road carnage, deadly brews, incurable corruption, negative ethnicity and death of the national soul

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MOURNING THE ONLY PRINCIPAL I KNEW

By Dr.Paul Bundi Karau I arrived at Kanyakine High School on 18th February 1999 a small village boy. I had never been to a boarding school, and certainly this is the furthest from home I had ever gone. The boys who were assigned to escort me to Mungania dorm looked at my stunted height and loudly wondered how I would survive in Beast's school.  "Who is Beast?" I asked in bewilderment. "You will know." Musyoki answered curtly. It didn't take me long to know who Beast was. The following day, as the 10 o'clock tea was being served, I heard a commotion, with boys leaving their tea and running helter-skelter towards the classrooms.  I was a fresh mono, so I didn't know what was happening. I ran along the pavement, and came upon a mighty man, who appeared to be adjusting his trousers. He yanked his belt and thrust one whip towards me. I had encountered Beast himself. He was tall, imposing, burly and endowed with a thunderous voice that could re...

Political Tumbocrats

*Political Tumbocrats* A political tumbocrat is a person who hangs around elected leaders to satisfy her/his personal greed. Tumbocrats sees a leader as a demigod whom they worship. The r bootlickers and sycophants of the highest order. Their work is to defend leaders and cheat public that something is happening. A tumbocrat has no values or morals. A tumbocrat is not interested with common good but personal good. A tumbocrat has no vision but appetite for being near high table of power  and feeding on crumbs.   Tumbocrats are greatest obstacles to development in our country. They protect the corrupt and shield the bad governance in so far as they get something to fill their tumbos. They are good and articulate in arguments but they lack the moral authority because they don't value truth. Every political leader is surrounded by tumbocrats. They are the noise makers in social media and around leaders defending them. They peddle lies en create propagandas . They confuse the publ...