Skip to main content

The new technique fraudsters are employing to wipe out M-pesa account balances from phones of unsuspecting consumers, Share widely

This is how it goes. A victim is called by a total stranger purporting to be working for any of the mobile service providers, claiming they have won cash even for promotions they were not involved in. To trap their would-be victims or unsuspecting phone subscribers, the caller cautions the victim never to share the PIN even as they jointly plan to transfer the proceeds of a non-existent cash. That gives a sense of false confidence. According to the victims accounts, the callers appear "fine, graduates and people with either a link or experience in customer care of mobile service providers". They add "unlike the Kamiti prison fraudsters, the latest callers are not in a hurry and call the prey repeatedly without switching off their numbers". Once their prey are convinced, they ask them whether or not they have any money in their M-Pesa accounts so as to avoid exceeding the allowable holding limit. They are so clever in asking not for the exact amount but round figure. Once assured, they proceed to the next step according to the script. It is then that their prey are asked to call #555555 to have the funds transfer process commenced. The caller would then receive "secret password" a combination of digits and letters. Incidentally and to confuse their prey more, such number comes from a customized short-code christened "Equity Bank" as was the case with today's victims. Other instructions follow and the victim is asked repeatedly and "genuinely" whether or not he/she has received the cash. It is then that the victim discovers his account balance. Today, one of the victims lost Sh9,999 in the hope of getting an additional Sh50,000. Another one lost Sh18,500. Many got unreported. Such victims fall for the trap either due to greed but mostly because they are not fully sensitized.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Take care of yourself__"The first wealth is health".

By Strive Masiyiwa  A few weeks ago I went to the doctor. I will tell you what he said about my health at the end, but first read this: Twenty years ago, I arranged to meet a well-known British international businessman who invested a lot in Africa at the time. We agreed to meet for dinner at a leading hotel in London.  After a good meeting, we started to walk out of the restaurant when he suddenly collapsed in the lobby. There was total pandemonium as they rushed to get medical assistance. Being London, an ambulance arrived in minutes. I jumped in the back with him as paramedics wrestled to keep him alive. He had had a heart attack and had to have triple bypass heart surgery. Sadly he died a few weeks later. He hadn't been sick and his sudden death surprised everyone. And yet as I reflected on it, and later discussed it with a doctor friend who knew him, I realized he was very laid back about his health despite having a hectic business life. Even during our dinner...

When a government buys off trendsetters—like influencers, celebrities, or thought leaders—for selfish or self-serving reasons

When a government buys off trendsetters—like influencers, celebrities, or thought leaders—for selfish or self-serving reasons (e.g., to manipulate public opinion, suppress dissent, or promote harmful policies), several consequences can follow: 1. Erosion of Public Trust: People may begin to distrust both the trendsetters and the government, especially if the manipulation is exposed. This can create widespread cynicism and disengagement from civic life. 2. Distortion of Public Discourse: When influential voices push misleading or biased narratives, genuine debate and informed decision-making suffer. This weakens democratic processes and polarizes society. 3. Suppression of Dissent: Paying trendsetters to promote government agendas may marginalize or silence critics, undermining freedom of speech and weakening resistance to poor or corrupt policies. 4. Short-Term Gain, Long-Term Instability: While the government might benefit in the short run (e.g., winning elections, suppressing protest...